Skip to main content

Water sensitive urban design (WSUD)

Design - stormwater management options

Requirements for effective stormwater management that involve a series of treatment stages designed to improve water quality and reduce environmental impacts.

Stormwater management options

LIM_WSUD_pic_sw mgt options.jpg

Treatment levels for stormwater structural controls, as part of a treatment train, include:

  • Primary treatment – screening, isolation, separation, settling
  • Secondary treatment – absorption, filtration, flocculation, settling
  • Tertiary treatment – (polishing) aeration, biological decomposition, biological uptake, disinfection, fixation, nitrification, denitrification, oxidation, solar treatment, volatilisation, settling.

The following options may be used to reduce the volume of stormwater runoff:

  • Source control devices – systems which reduce the volume of stormwater runoff flowing into the receiving environment.  e.g. rainwater tanks, porous surface treatments systems.
  • Other systems – systems which may utilise stormwater runoff for the benefit of another asset. e.g. stormwater harvesting and re-use (such as irrigation) to replace potable water use.

See Figure 4: Stormwater management options.


Figure 4: Stormwater management options


Treatment train 

A treatment train is a combination of treatment systems/levels, designed to effectively intercept, moderate and eliminate gross pollutants (litter) from stormwater runoff or groundwater. The overall goal is to enhance and preserve natural waterways while mitigating flood risk and damage to life and property. 

When used appropriately in collaboration with adequate land management practices, treatment trains provide a holistic approach to WSUD and strengthen the function of natural wetlands, waterways and marine environments.

Standalone treatment systems (e.g. swales, bio-retention systems etc.) are not efficient in removing all pollutants. Generally a treatment train approach is required, however with small catchments the stormwater can be directed to a bio-retention basin, and it may be the sole device used to treat the stormwater to the required standard. 

Problem:

  • Pollutants such as excess nutrients, sediment, herbicides, pesticides and other heavy metals introduced by urban, agricultural and industrial uses degrade natural waterways.

Aim:

  • A treatment train design is in accordance with the quality and quantity of water entering the system, site constraints and target pollutant reduction. 
  • Selection and order of treatment systems is imperative for appropriate development of a treatment train.
  • A failed treatment system can have a cascading effect downstream, from blockages within the underground pipe network to failed dam walls (such as at detention basins), or ecological damage within the RAMSAR listed wetlands of the Pumicestone Passage in Moreton Bay Marine Park. 
  • Treatment train design depends on the following:
    • location (soils, groundwater, hydrology)
    • available space
    • land use
    • existing management practices
    • source of pollutants
    • treatment required
    • costs (construction, operation. maintenance/monitoring) 
    • community requirements/expectations.

Within the Sunshine Coast Region, numerous treatment systems are utilised, as outlined below. 

See Figure 7: Stormwater treatment train (example).

WSUD treatment/methods/and auxiliary embellishments

To provide the best and most robust stormwater treatment, all stormwater quality treatment systems should ideally incorporate an array of primary, secondary and tertiary treatment measures.

See the following for further guidance:

  • Figure 5: WSUD treatment/methods and relationship with auxiliary embellishments
  • Figure 6: WSUD treatment/methods thumbnail summary
  • Table 3: WSUD treatment/methods technical summary.

Note:   This category should be read in conjunction with Council's Flooding and Stormwater Management Guidelines.


Figure 5: WSUD treatment / methods and relationship with auxiliary embellishments


Figure 6: WSUD treatment/methods thumbnail summary


Figure 7:  Stormwater treatment train (example)


Table 3: WSUD treatment/methods technical summary
Treatment type
Treatment sub-type
Description

PRIMARY LEVEL TREATMENT

Gross pollutant devices

  • Gross pollutant trap (GPT)
  • Gully pit (including basket)
Gross pollutant devices are structures that capture solid waste, e.g. litter, organic matter, coarse sediment

PRIMARY LEVEL TREATMENT

Sediment basins


Sediment basins are stormwater pond systems that are used to trap coarse sediment, and debris, and to regulate flows entering the downstream treatment system. 

SECONDARY LEVEL TREATMENT

Swales

  • Grass
  • Vegetated
Swales are linear channels (some lined with grass, some vegetated), that collect and transfer stormwater instead of, or in addition to, the underground piped stormwater network

TERTIARY LEVEL TREATMENT

Bio-retention systems


Bio-retention systems remove sediment and pollutants from stormwater runoff with the use of specifically selected, densely planted vegetation. Surface runoff percolates through multiple layers of filter media, utilising biological uptake, adsorption and fine filtration

TERTIARY LEVEL TREATMENT

Constructed wetlands

  • Wetland (permanently wet)
  • Ephemeral wetland
Wetlands are shallow, densely vegetated water bodies which use sedimentation, fine filtration and biological uptake to remove pollutants and excess nutrients from stormwater

TERTIARY LEVEL TREATMENT

Vegetated infiltration system

  • Basin
Vegetated infiltration systems collect rainfall, both on site and via stormwater pipes. The roots of the vegetation and the bio-films attached to the plants remove nutrients in the stormwater

SOURCE CONTROL

Porous surface treatment


Porous surface treatments allow water to percolate through to a subsurface course, where it either infiltrates to the surrounding soil, or is filtered back to the drainage system.

SOURCE CONTROL

Rainwater tanks

  • Above ground
  • Underground
Rainwater tanks are designed to intercept and collect rainwater runoff from impervious surfaces such as building roofs, before it enters the stormwater system

SOURCE CONTROL

Passive irrigation

  • Storm watered street trees
  • Wicking beds/lawns
Passive irrigation involves the use of stormwater for irrigation without the need for additional energy resources

OTHER SYSTEM 

Stormwater harvesting

  • Stormwater reuse as irrigation
Stormwater harvesting can be defined as the collection, treatment, storage and re-use of stormwater runoff from a variety of sources, including hard surfaces such as roads, car parks and pathways; and natural surfaces such as open space and landscaped areas


Primary level treatment

Gross pollutant device

Gross pollutant devices are structures that capture solid waste, e.g. litter, organic matter, coarse sediment. 

Most commonly, gross pollutant catchment devices are used as primary treatments within a treatment train, removing large, non-biodegradable pollutants.

There are two types of gross pollutant devices: 

  • Gross pollutant traps (GPTs)
  • Gully pits (including basket).

Gross pollutant traps (GPTs)

LIM_WSUD_pic_GPT 2.jpg

Gross pollutant traps (GPTs)

GPT structures may be suitable for high density developments such as CBDs, industrial areas, shopping precincts or fast food outlets.

Provision

As GPTs are typically not effective in removing nutrients, they are most often used as part of a treatment train with other stormwater treatment elements, e.g. wetlands or bio-retention systems.

Function

By removing gross pollutants, treatment of stormwater can occur more effectively, preventing downstream systems from becoming overloaded.

This is achieved through physical screening of stormwater to remove gross pollutants, rapid sedimentation and other separation processes.

  • GPTs trap anthropogenic pollutants, organic matter and coarse sediments in a concentrated location for ease of maintenance.
  • GPTs provide pre-treatment within the overall treatment system in areas where there is a high gross pollutant load (commercial, industrial and high density urban). Not suitable for residential or open space.
  • Studies have found increased nutrient concentrations downstream of some gross pollutant traps under dry weather flows. There are potential detrimental impacts on downstream water quality where gross pollutant traps are used in isolation (i.e. when not used in conjunction with a vegetated bio-retention or wetland system, or when not adequately maintained to remove pollutants). 
Design

GPTs are to be positioned so as to avoid both compromising network performance and tidal inundation.

See the following for further guidance:

  • Table 4: Advantages and limitations for use of gross pollutant traps
  • Figure 8: Typical gross pollutant trap.


Table 4: Advantages and limitations for use of gross pollutant traps
Advantages
Limitations
  • Pollutants are collected/trapped at a central point for removal
  • May be retrofitted into existing urban areas
  • Visual impacts are minimised by locating GPTs underground
  • Relatively small footprint above ground
  • No vegetation to maintain.
  • Litter collection point can be prone to blockage from large debris
  • Potential for upstream flooding due to blockages
  • Flooding potential due to HAT (highest astronomical tide) levels lowering pipe storage capacity, or loss from network backwatering, i.e. the water of a stream kept above an otherwise expected level due to downstream controlling influence.
  • Above ground appearance can have detrimental visual impact (concrete structure)
  • Potential health risk to workers through handling of contaminated litter and confined space entry
  • Can be expensive and difficult to clean (may require vacuum extraction)
  • When poorly maintained, GPTs may become a flood hazard or a pollution source
  • Potential increased nutrient concentrations downstream of GPTs under dry weather flows
  • Complex to install, with high build costs
  • Not effective in removing nutrient
  • Do not contribute to flood control.


Figure 8:  Typical gross pollutant trap


Gully pits (including basket)

LIM_WSUD_pic_gully pit_grate design.jpg

Gully pits can be installed within new and existing underground drains typically in road corridors (kerb and channel) in high litter generation sites such as commercial precincts and tourist areas. 

Gully pit baskets sit inside the gully pit capturing pollutants and litter, limiting it entering the stormwater drain system. 

Provision

Gully pits are piped entry points to the stormwater network. Gully pit baskets are inserted within the gully pit to capture gross pollutants and organic debris.

The piped stormwater network is used as part of the pre-treatment within the overall treatment train where piped stormwater systems exist. 

Function
  • Captures large percentage of gross pollutants.
Design
  • Max Q bicycle safe grates only. Horizontal lines create the potential for tramlining wheeled devices such as bicycles, wheelchairs, scooters.
  • Ensure the grate is flush with the road surface finish level to prevent a hazard for cyclists who often ride in gutters to avoid collision with vehicles. 
  • The location of a gully pit must be carefully considered prior to install to prevent future flooding.
  • Site selection should ensure that basket drains freely.

See the following for further guidance:

  • Table 5: Advantages and limitations for use of gully pit (including baskets)
  • Figure 9: Typical gully pit (including basket).


Table 5: Advantages and limitations for use of gully pit (including baskets)
Advantages
Limitations
  • Cost effective primary treatment solution
  • Can be incorporated into new gully pits, or can be retrofitted into existing gully pits
  • Stored litter is kept in an aerobic environment, which minimises release of dissolved pollutants
  • Simple maintenance - basket removal or vacuum excavation truck
  • Basket liners are interchangeable, to capture differing levels and sizes of pollutants/litter.
  • Captures large percentage of gross pollutants
  • Reduced downstream maintenance
  • Minimal visual impacts (installed below ground level).
  • Can be prone to blockage from large debris.
  • Inefficient or infrequent maintenance can cause pollutants to build up, which may cause additional pollutants to over top basket and enter the piped stormwater network.
  • Potential upstream flooding due to blockages or reducing the capacity of the inlet. As a result, gully pit baskets are not recommended for flat areas or trapped sags where ponding may already be a problem, e.g. during large rain events. Consequently, the locations needs to be carefully considered before installation.


Figure 9: Typical gully pit (including basket)


Sediment basins

Sediment basins are stormwater pond systems that are used to trap coarse sediment, and debris, and to regulate flows entering the downstream treatment system. These basins are a primary treatment system, using a permanent water column to reduce flow velocities and promote settling.

LIM_WSUD_pic_sediment basin.jpg

Sediment basins may be suitable (but not limited to) as either long-term or temporary basins to capture water and disturbed soils. Long-term/permanent environments may be suitable for ‘end of line’ treatments in open spaces. Temporary installations may be suitable for construction sites to capture eroded or disturbed soil during rain events. 

Provision

  • Sediment basins are not a stand alone treatment. 
  • To be used for pre-treatment of stormwater prior to entering wetlands or large bio-retention systems.
  • Should be placed where most runoff is likely to occur, to mitigate sediment entering watercourses. 
  • Reduce the velocity of stormwater flow, allowing coarse sediments to settle – gravity pulls the coarse and medium sediments to the bottom of the basin.

Function

  • Used for the collection of sediment runoff.
  • Cleaner water stays near the surface and flows downstream through the outlet.

Design

  • Shade trees should be planted on the banks of sediment basins to reduce water temperatures, limit weed growth and improve the natural amenity of the basin environment. Select appropriate trees, ensuring they do not produce heavy amounts of leaf litter. Too much leaf litter will have negative impacts on the function of the basin. 
  • Sediment basins are not designed to completely empty. The hard base e.g. concrete or gravel, is utilised to capture the water and hold the sediment. It also provides a useful guide when the basin requires cleaning out, acting as a marker for how deep to dig. 
  • Maintenance of sediment basins is relatively simple, requiring de-watering (drying of material to minimise disposal costs) and removal of contaminated sediment. 
  • A suitable site for de-watering and an adequate maintenance access for silt removal should be provided. Maintenance access is to be a ramp on the bank or concrete ramp to accommodate machine entry to basin.

See Table 6: Advantages and limitations for use of sediment basins for further guidance.

Table 6:  Advantages and limitations for use of sediment basins
Advantages
Limitations
  • High capture rate for coarse sediments
  • Relatively low cost
  • Effective even when full of water.
  • Difficult and expensive to relocate, if required.
  • Limited to areas where sufficient land is available.
  • In a park setting, it must be designed as small as functionally possible to maximise recreational areas.


Secondary level treatment

Swales

Swales are shallow, linear, channels  (some lined with grass, some vegetated) that collect and transfer stormwater instead of, or in addition to, the underground piped stormwater network. The shallow channels are primarily designed for conveying water in a longitudinal manner through a drainage pathway. They can be grass lined, or more densely vegetated and landscaped.

LIM_WSUD_pic_swale types_vegetated2.jpg

Swales may be suitable for use (but not limited to) along road corridors such as, e.g. road verges and landscape corridors. Swales are best located to help re-vegetate areas, direct water to trees, and to provide water to semi-dry areas. 

Provision

To optimise pollutant removal, swales need adequate contact time with stormwater run-off, vegetation and the soil surface. 

The following types of swales are used across the Sunshine Coast region:

LIM_WSUD_pic_swale types_grassed.jpg
  • Grassed swales – can achieve moderate sediment deposition rates provided flows are well distributed across the full width and length of the swale and the longitudinal grade of the swale is kept low enough to maintain slower flow conditions.
LIM_WSUD_pic_swale types_vegetated1.jpg
  • Vegetated swales – can offer improved sediment retention by slowing flows and providing enhanced sedimentation for deeper flows. Densely vegetated swales have higher hydraulic roughness and therefore require a larger area to convey flows compared to grass swales.
LIM_WSUD_pic_swale types_natural channel design.jpg
  • Natural channel design – These often provide a natural, creek like appearance with incorporated rock riffles, small detention pools and riparian vegetation along embankments – they may also provide elements of fish passage, wildlife and frog habitat – pools may retain some water during drier seasons. These channels are not purposely constructed, however they still achieve a high quality low flow water treatment.

Function

  • Overland conveyance of stormwater
  • Screening and removal of gross pollutants such as litter and coarse sediment.
  • Support for the holistic stormwater system by removing sediments and nutrients from runoff.
  • Immobilise pollutants by binding them to organic matter and soil particles, then removal by settling, filtration and infiltration into the subsoil. Pollutants, such as hydrocarbons, may be digested and processed by soil micro-organisms. 

Design

In urban areas, swales may be used as an alternative to:

  • conventional street nature strips
  • road centre median strips
  • run-off collection points in carpark areas.

In rural areas with enough space and slope, swales may be used with road sealing to:

  • reduce negative impacts from increased  stormwater runoff
  • connecting impervious areas to existing drainage systems.

See the following for further guidance:

  • Table 7: Advantages and limitations for use of swales
  • Figure 11: Typical swales types.


Table 7:  Advantages and limitations for use of swales
Advantages
Limitations
  • Reduce and slow stormwater run-off
  • Retain particulate pollutants close to the source
  • More aesthetically appealing than kerb and channel
  • Relatively inexpensive to build
  • Do not contribute to the impervious area in the catchment.
  • Provide limited removal of fine sediment and dissolved pollutants
  • Use more land area than kerb and channel, and restrict activities such as pedestrian movement and car parking
  • Only suitable for slopes of 1- 4% only - less than 1% they become waterlogged, greater than 4% and water velocity can cause scouring issues
  • Require regular inspection and maintenance
  • Limited to catchments up to 1-2 ha. In catchments greater than this, flow depth and velocity result in very little treatment occurring
  • Can be visually unappealing if vegetation dies.


Figure 11:  Typical swale types


Tertiary level treatments

Bio-retention systems

Bio-retention systems remove sediment and pollutants from stormwater runoff with the use of specifically selected, densely planted vegetation. Surface runoff percolates through multiple layers of filter media, utilising biological uptake, adsorption and fine filtration.

LIM_WSUD_pic_bioretention system_at source1.jpg

Bio-retention systems that are ‘direct flow – at source’, may be suitable for use in (but not limited to) road verges, streetscapes and carparks where they are found in the form of ‘raingardens’, ‘water gardens’ or ‘walkable bio-retention systems’ to control the flow and direction of water to prevent unnecessary flooding caused by added road infrastructure 

LIM_WSUD_pic_bioretention system_end of line.jpg

Bio-retention systems that are a ‘pipe system – end of line’, may be suitable for use in open spaces, such as recreational parks and environmental reserves. 

Provision

Bio-retention systems are designed to stop stormwater pollutants from entering receiving waters. They are specially designed to filter stormwater runoff from surrounding areas or via stormwater pipes.  They use filter media, plants and microbes to biologically treat stormwater.  They can be used as 'direct flow' (at source) or 'end of line' systems.

Bio-retention systems can be established at different scales and can take on many different forms. Examples include:

  • street tree systems
  • bio-retention swales
  • bio-retention basin/raingardens.

Function

Bio-retention systems consist of a soil bed planted with suitable vegetation. Stormwater runoff entering the system is filtered through the soil planting bed before being conveyed downstream by either an underground drain system, or infiltrated into the existing subsoil below the soil bed.

Bio-retention systems operate as follows:

  • water collects and settles in the base
  • water soaks through the filter media trapping rubbish and sediment on the surface and in the fore-bay
  • plants utilise the nutrients in the stormwater, and remove some toxins (i.e. hydrocarbons)
  • beneficial microbes on the roots of the plants enhance the biological uptake of pollutants
  • large systems may contain a sediment basin and/or flow distribution system to manage the large inflows that they receive
  • may contain a high flow bypass or an overflow system to reduce flooding.

Design

  • Ensure the design takes into consideration pedestrian/cyclist safety, in regards to the transition between the system and pathway. 
  • Fencing is not preferred as a solution to reducing safety risk. 
  • Include preventative measures to protect the road pavement from tree roots and seepage.
  • The system must be designed so as not to impede pedestrian movement, particularly in road reserves.

The following should be considered for most appropriate plant selection/use:

  • Selected species are to have sufficient depth to prevent tree roots from entering any subsurface pipework.
  • Select plants with root systems that break down pollutants and help to keep the filter media absorbent. 
  • Select plants used that are able to tolerate potentially extended periods of dry conditions and sandy soils.
  • Two distinct vegetation styles may be utilised depending on the system requirements:
    • Low growing species such as shrubs, grasses, sedges and groundcovers (more prevalent due to constraints from tree roots and infrastructure damage)
    • Contain both a canopy and an understory - trees may be used where sufficient media depth and surface area is incorporated.
  • Council has a preference for native species.
  • Established plant height must consider sight line issues and Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED). 
  • Plants with low attrition rates are preferred.
  • Plants should be aesthetically pleasing.
  • If trees are planted alongside the bio-retention systems, select trees that are appropriate, ensuring they do not produce a heavy amount of leaf litter. Too much leaf litter will have negative impacts on the function of the system. 

An appropriate level of landscape design is required to compliment the surrounding landscape character.

Landscape design of bio-retention systems must address stormwater quality objectives while also considering:

  • Road visibility (vehicle sight lines)
  • Public safety (CPTED guidelines)
  • Community character and habitat (indigenous species)
  • Equal access.

Hydraulic design is to ensure:

  • Effective stormwater treatment
  • Minimise damage by storm flows
  • Protect hydraulic integrity and function of associated minor and major drainage systems.

Vegetation such as sedges and tufted grasses are required to: 

  • Cover the whole bio-retention filter media surface
  • Be capable of withstanding minor and major flows
  • Be of sufficient density to prevent damage to preferred flow paths, scour and re-suspension of sediments
  • Continuously break up the surface of the filter media which prevents surface clogging
  • Provide a substrate for biofilm growth
  • Provide dense vegetation planting to discourage the movement of vehicles onto the bio-retention basin
  • Provide a physical barrier (e.g. tree planting)
  • Services within road verges must be considered together with access for maintenance.
Walkable bioretention areas – design
LIM_WSUD_pic_walkable bioretention_grassed.jpg

Consider all abilities when designing walkable bio-retention systems. A clear pedestrian path of travel is required through the system. Defined edges such as concrete garden edging and stone blocks provide clues for people with low vision.

See the following for further guidance:

  • Table 8: Advantages and limitations for use of bio-retention systems
  • Figure 12: Typical bio-retention system
  • Figure 13: Typical walkable bio-retention systems
  • Appendix C - Existing construction sequences to demonstrate the process of real projects managed by council. 
  • Appendix D - Situations to avoid for successful bio-retention basins. Shows key problem areas council strives to avoid. 
  • LIM Planting palette for plant species guidance.

Table 8:  Advantages and limitations for use of bio-retention systems
Advantages
Limitations
  • Onsite treatment of stormwater 
  • Removal of rubbish and sediment 
  • Visual amenity 
  • Environmental enhancement 
  • Overflow systems to reduce flooding 
  • Habitat for native wildlife 
  • Assist with heat island impacts.
  • Limited capacity, which can equate to low treatment volume 
  • Filter media may need replacement along with plants throughout the life of the system 
  • Reduces verge size, restricting pedestrian movement and parking 
  • Modifications in residential settings by residents can reduce effectiveness of systems
  • Not to be constructed in large catchments with high flows 
  • Can reduce functional areas of open space.

Figure 12: Typical bio-retention system


Figure 13: Typical walkable bio-retention systems


Constructed wetlands

Constructed wetlands are shallow, densely vegetated water bodies which use sedimentation, fine filtration and biological uptake to remove pollutants and excess nutrients from stormwater. Water levels rise during rainfall events, and outlets slowly release flows back to pre-event levels.

LIM_WSUD_pic_permanent wetland.jpg

Constructed wetlands maybe permanently wet or ephemeral. They may be suitable in open spaces that naturally collect or hold water. Some locations may remain wet all year round and other areas will evaporate seasonally.

Natural wetlands

Natural wetlands are areas of permanent / intermittent inundation, with water that is static or flowing, fresh, brackish or salt, including areas of marine water the depth of which at low tide does not exceed 6.0 m (Queensland Wetland Definition and Delineation Guideline Part A September 2011).

Natural wetlands are not to be used to treat urban stormwater runoff. Runoff must be pre-treated prior to being released into natural wetlands.

Constructed wetlands – general

Provision
  • Typically, wetlands are part of a series of treatments (a treatment train).
  • Other treatments, such as gross pollutant traps and sediment ponds in the inlet zone, protect the wetland by removing coarse sediment and rubbish. Litter booms may also be used where appropriate. 
  • The wetland removes fine particles and dissolved pollutants like nutrients and heavy metals.

A constructed (artificial) wetland is one built where there was no wetland prior to the construction. Constructed stormwater wetland systems provide a means of treating and removing pollutants from stormwater prior to entering creeks, rivers and oceans. Constructed wetlands should replicate the behaviour of naturally occurring wetlands as far as possible.

Constructed wetlands typically have three parts that work together to help filter stormwater and protect against flooding:

  1. Inlet zone – a sediment basin that removes coarse sediment
  2. Macrophyte zone – the main part of the wetland; a shallow area densely planted with aquatic plants, which removes fine particles and dissolved pollutants
  3. High flow bypass – lets excess water flow around the wetland without damaging the plants.

There are 3 types of constructed wetlands:

  • Permanent wetlands
  • Ephemeral wetlands
  • Floating treatment wetlands (NOT supported by council).
Function

Wetlands work on 3 levels: 

  • Physical
    • Plants are essential parts of a wetland and are used to capture fine particles and trap a high proportion of absorbed pollutants attached to sediment.
    • These plants also slow and filter water, which encourages fine sediment particles to settle, and reduce the chance of sediment being scoured or re-suspended in the water during a large storm.
  • Biological and chemical uptake
    • Slimy micro-organisms called biofilms grow on the surface of plants, absorbing and trapping pollutants, enhancing sedimentation and adhesion to fine suspended particles.
  • Pollutant transformation
    • Wetlands transform the pollutants in stormwater in a number of ways:
    • Their regular wetting and drying cycle stabilises and fixes contaminants, such as phosphorus and metals, in the underlying soil.
    • Microbial processes convert pollutants like ammonium and nitrate into nitrogen gas, which is released into the atmosphere (nitrification/de-nitrification).
    • Ultraviolet (UV) treatment in open water areas provides some disinfection.
Design 
  • Wetlands may have open water ponds at the inlet and outlet, but should otherwise be planted so densely that the water is not easily visible. This avoids problems such as algal growth and sediment re-suspension through wind and wave action.
  • Wetland plants must be protected from overly high flow velocities and being frequently inundated with water for long periods of time.

See the following for further guidance: 

  • Table 9: Advantages and limitations for use of constructed wetlands
  • Figure 14: Typical permanent constructed wetland
  • Appendix C - Existing construction sequences to demonstrate the process of real projects managed by council.


Table 9: Advantages and limitations for use of constructed wetlands
Advantages
Limitations
  • Create wildlife habitat for local flora and fauna 
  • Provide the community with passive recreational activities to provide social, cultural and environmental well-being 
  • Adds scenic and educational value to the community 
  • Good pollutant removal 
  • Self sustaining system 
  • Uses natural processes.
  • Contamination of stormwater, i.e. pathogens, inorganic and organic chemicals 
  • Odour and mosquito production (where poorly designed) 
  • May require vegetation management
  • May require a large land area 
  • Not suitable for steep sites.

Permanent wetlands

Function

Permanent wetlands are always, or nearly always, inundated. They do not dry out, and lose a relatively small percentage of their volume even during unusually dry periods. They are dominated by aquatic plants and also:

  • Support a broad range of wildlife, such as fish, reptiles and birds
  • Can be used by the full complement of wetland-breeding amphibians and most invertebrates
  • Wetland macrophytes are common.

See Figure 14: Typical permanent wetland.


Figure 14: Typical permanent constructed wetland


Ephemeral wetlands

Function
LIM_WSUD_pic_ephemeral wetland.jpg

Ephemeral or short hydroperiod wetlands dry out in most years, may be dry for years and may only be wet for a short period (ephemerally).

Wet and dry wetlands replicate the Australian natural environment. They provide: 

  • Improved weed control – weeds die when wetland is dry
  • Better at fixing pollution to sediment
  • Important resources to local and migratory species.


Vegetated infiltration systems

Vegetated infiltration systems collect rainfall both on site and via stormwater pipes. The roots of the vegetation and the biofilms that grow on plants remove nutrients in the stormwater.  After detention, the water infiltrates into the surrounding soils and may recharge groundwater.  They are most successful with soils that have a high infiltration rate. 

LIM_WSUD_pic_veg infiltration.jpg

Vegetated infiltration systems allow stormwater to infiltrate into the subsurface after being captured in a basin or when flowing slowly along a channel. These are typically located in areas of high permeability e.g. sandy soils.

Provision

The purpose of these systems is to treat diverted stormwater. The sediment in the runoff settles onto the basin floor while the remaining water infiltrates through the soils below. 

These systems may be used where discharge to a natural system is required, or in situations where groundwater recharge is to be maintained at pre-development runoff volumes. 

Moderately to highly permeable in-situ soils i.e. sandy loams to sandy soils, are best suited for vegetated infiltration systems. Geotechnical investigations are required to determine the ability of site soil to accept infiltration.

Vegetated infiltration systems should not be located in areas of impermeable soils. In areas of contaminated land, a risk assessment should be undertaken prior to design and construction.

Function

The main functions of these systems are:

  • Typically used in public open space applications
  • Composed of a natural or constructed depression
  • Designed to capture and store runoff on the ground surface prior to infiltration into in-situ soils
  • Best suited to highly permeable (e.g. sandy) soils
  • Can be planted out to blend into the surrounding landscape
  • Vegetation provide water quality benefits, and root systems may prevent clogging of the basin floor
  • Pre-treatment may be required for high sediment catchment areas
  • Plants in an infiltration basin should be able to tolerate periods of prolonged inundation or extended dry periods.
  • Biological and chemical uptake
    • Slimy micro-organisms called biofilms grow on the surface of plants, absorbing and trapping pollutants, enhancing sedimentation and adhesion to fine suspended particles.

See Table 10: Advantages and limitations for use of vegetated infiltration systems for further guidance.


Table 10: Advantages and limitations for use of vegetated infiltration systems
Advantages
Limitations
  • Contribute to groundwater recharge 
  • Reduce stormwater runoff peak flows and volumes 
  • Reduce downstream flooding 
  • Managing the hydraulic regime entering the downstream aquatic ecosystems 
  • Can be incorporated into landscaping 
  • Suitable for roadside applications and linear channels 
  • Can significantly reduce pollutant load that is discharged into receiving waterbodies 
  • Can be more aesthetically pleasing than conventional drainage channels.
  • Limited to relatively small catchment areas 
  • Pollutant build up can be difficult to perceive 
  • Poor maintenance regimes, incorrect positioning and high inflow of debris can cause devices to fail 
  • Require sufficient setback from structures to avoid any structural damage from the wetting and drying of soils 
  • Unable to measure the 'quality' of the water leaving the device 
  • Infiltration may be limited by high groundwater table 
  • Can reduce functional area of open space 
  • Can be visually unappealing if vegetation dies.


Source control treatments

Porous surface treatments

Porous surface treatments allow water to percolate through to a subsurface course, where it either infiltrates to the surrounding soil, or is filtered back to the drainage system.

LIM_WSUD_pic_porous surface treatments_.jpg

Porous surface treatments may be suitable for (but not limited to) use in carparks and pathways where it is important to capture the water to filter back into the ground and water the surrounding trees/gardens.

Provision

Porous surface treatments may come in the form of porous pavements (also known as permeable pavements). They are load bearing alternatives to impervious pavements which promote infiltration. 

These solutions can perform primary and secondary treatment measures, including:

  • Physical screening
  • Rapid sedimentation
  • Separation processes.

Function

The main functions of these treatments are:

  • To treat stormwater which falls directly onto the surface treatment, such as pavements
  • Where stormwater does not require any further treatment
  • To achieve the same engineering requirements as conventional pavement
  • For use in carparks
  • Areas adjacent to mature/existing trees where surrounding hard surfaces do not allow adequate growing conditions.

Design

Porous paving products include the following:

  • Porous concrete pavements (modular and monolithic) allow stormwater to filter through the pavement surface
  • Pavements made from special asphalts that allow stormwater to filter through the pavement surface
  • Concrete grid and turfed grid pavers allow stormwater to filter through voids in the concrete
  • Plastic modular block pavement is not supported, as structural damage from tyre loads shortens the product life span. 

See the following for further guidance:

  • Table 11: Advantages and limitations for use of porous surface treatments
  • Figure 15: Typical porous surface treatments.


Table 11: Advantages and limitations for use of porous surface treatments
Advantages
Limitations
  • Pollutants are retained close to the source 
  • Peak stormwater discharges from paved areas is reduced during low intensity rainfall events 
  • Stormwater quality is improved and groundwater recharge is increased 
  • May be more aesthetically pleasing than conventional pavements 
  • Area of land dedicated solely to stormwater management is reduced 
  • Improved runoff quality, due to sediment and pollutant removal 
  • Incorporating WSUD techniques while allowing co-location with car parking or trafficability 
  • Reduce stormwater runoff peak flows and volumes.
  • Only able to support light traffic loads 
  • Subsoil drainage systems may need to be incorporated in areas with low permeability soils 
  • Surface clogging with sediments and oil is a potential cause of failure 
  • Can result in contamination of shallow aquifers 
  • Pavers can become loose over time and fail if laid incorrectly 
  • May require increased herbicide use/treatment to maintain weeds adequately.
Figure 15: Typical porous surface treatments


Rainwater tanks

Rainwater tanks are designed to intercept and collect rainwater runoff from impervious surfaces such as building roofs, before it enters the stormwater system. This is then stored in the rainwater tank.

LIM_WSUD_pic_rainwater tank.jpg

Rainwater tanks may be suitable for (but not limited to) use when attached to buildings to utilise the water captured from the roof. The captured water may be used in several ways; irrigation of nearby sportsfields and gardens, or to support the internal plumbing supply. 

Provision

There are 2 types of rainwater tanks:

  • Above ground
  • Under ground.

Function

The main function for rainwater tanks is to reduce the demand/consumption of potable water. 

Design

  • Ensure mesh screen are installed on all access points to keep tank vermin free. 
  • Filter may be required if needed for consumption.

See Table 12: Advantages and limitations for use of rainwater tanks for further guidance

Table 12: Advantages and limitations for use of rainwater tanks
Advantages
Limitations
  • Pollutants are prevented from entering the stormwater network 
  • Volume of runoff from the site is reduced 
  • Reduced volume of stormwater requiring treatment downstream 
  • Can be installed below ground to minimise visual impacts 
  • Can be integrated into the design of the structure 
  • Reduce consumption of potable water.
  • Can impact casual surveillance (CPTED) 
  • Tank may be subject to vandalism, modification and unintended access 
  • Vermin (including mosquitoes) may gain entry if mesh screens are not installed on all access points to tanks 
  • Require regular cleaning 
  • Once the rainwater tank has reached capacity, the water either overflows onto the ground or into the stormwater network


Passive irrigation

Passive irrigation involves the use of stormwater for irrigation without the need for additional resources or human input.

Storm watered street trees are appropriate for use (but not limited to) streetscapes and road verges.

There are two types of passive irrigation:

  • Storm watered street trees
  • Wicking beds/lawns.

Storm watered street trees

LIM_WSUD_storm watered street trees.jpg

Storm watered street trees are appropriate for use (but not limited to) streetscapes and road verges.

Provision
  • Typically, gravity is used to direct runoff from hard, impervious surfaces into tree pits or other vegetated areas. Most commonly, this water is directed into tree pits via kerb and channel inlets.
  • Storm watered street trees are stand-alone systems, and are not suitable for stormwater treatment or conveyance.
Function

These systems can divert water at the surface, or through subsurface systems where plant roots can access the moisture.

See the following for further guidance:

  • Table 13: Advantages and limitations for use of passive irrigation of street trees
  • Figure 16: Example methods of laying pipe for passive irrigation of street trees
  • Figure 17: Trial examples of passive irrigation of street tree treatments.


Table 13: Advantages and limitations for use of storm watered street trees 
Advantages
Limitations
  • Low cost, low input source of irrigation (most basic form of irrigation) 
  • Reduce speed and volume of stormwater runoff
  • Recharge of groundwater stores at site 
  • Some types can be easily retrofitted 
  • Increase in soil moisture store at site 
  • During drought periods, trees will receive increased volume of water for irrigation.
  • Inlet may become blocked by debris, restricting inflows 
  • Existing underground services can be a constraint 
  • Permeability of in-situ soil may impact capacity to hold moisture 
  • Litter requires removal in open kerb installations.


Figure 16: Example methods of laying pipe for passive irrigation of street trees


Figure 17: Trial examples of passive irrigation of street tree treatments


Wicking beds, wicking lawns

LIM_WSUD_pic_wicking bed_2.jpg

Wicking beds/lawns are appropriate for use (but not limited to) streetscapes and road verges.

Provision

Wicking beds/lawns are vegetated systems that are irrigated via subsurface water storage that uses capillary action to wick (draw up) into the soil profile.

Wicking beds are an emerging proprietary technology. In accordance with the policy direction of the Council's Stormwater Management Strategy the performance of such technology needs to be demonstrated and independently validated against the national standard. Local field testing is also required to demonstrate that such technology will not be a burden or liability for Council, prior to broad scale adoption as public realm infrastructure. When this has been demonstrated, if such technology is provided as contributed infrastructure, it must be provided with a sinking fund to manage and maintain the asset over its design life.

Function
  • Wicking bed technology provides a storage area for locally harvested stormwater runoff
  • The beds draw water from the storage area to the root zone by using the natural capillary action of soil
Design
  • To provide vegetation with equal access to moisture, a wicking system needs to be located in a flat area
  • Depth of soil/media is to be adequate to support the capillary action required for wicking and soil aeration. 

See the following for further guidance:

  • Table 14: Advantages and limitations for use of wicking beds/lawns
  • Figure 18: Typical wicking beds/lawns.

Table 14: Advantages and limitations for use of wicking beds/lawns
Advantages
Limitations
  • Very safe form of stormwater harvesting, due to the physical separation of the storage area and park users 
  • Water is readily accessible, minimising the requirement for scheduled irrigation 
  • No water loss to evaporation from aerial irrigation 
  • Encourages deep root growth 
  • Reduces energy and potable water demands 
  • Increased resilience to prolonged periods of dry weather 
  • No water-logging 
  • Easily augmented by other waste water reuse products that may become available in future.
  • Unsuitable for sloped sites 
  • Existing underground services can be a constraint 
  • Pre-treatment of stormwater flows is required to remove debris and leaf litter 
  • Volume/cost of storage and need for augmentation with potable water.


Figure 18: Typical wicking beds/lawns


Other systems

Stormwater harvesting and re-use

Stormwater harvesting can be defined as the collection, treatment, storage and re-use of stormwater runoff from a variety of sources, including hard surfaces such as roads, car parks and pathways; and natural surfaces such as open space and landscaped areas.

LIM_WSUD_pic_stormwater harvesting_2.jpg

The stored stormwater may be used for (but not limited to) purposes such as garden and sportsfield irrigation.

Note:  Stormwater harvesting and re-use must be successfully trialled on a small scale with supporting evidence documented, prior to implementation on a larger scale.

Provision

Above-ground (tanks or open bodies of water) or below-ground (reservoirs or aquifers) may be used for the storage of harvested stormwater.

Function

  • Involves the collection, storage and eventual re-use of runoff from rain events.
  • Stored stormwater may be used for garden and sportsfield irrigation, and other non-potable uses.
  • In open space areas, this stored stormwater may be used to irrigate landscaped areas and sportsfields. 

See the following for further guidance:

  • Table 15: Advantages and limitations for use of stormwater harvesting
  • Figure 19: Typical stormwater harvesting.


Table 15: Advantages and limitations for use of stormwater harvesting
Advantages
Limitations
  • Can provide an alternative water source for irrigation and toilet flushing 
  • Stormwater harvesting may help in re-establishing a more natural water cycle, by: 
    • Managing the frequency and volume of runoff and flows during events 
    • Protecting and stabilising banks and habitats 
  • Reducing pollutant levels in downstream waterways 
  • Reductions in demand for potable water.
  • Contamination of stormwater, i.e. pathogens, inorganic and organic chemicals 
  • Unsafe storage/infrastructure 
  • Water may become stagnant over extended storage periods 
  • Open storage infrastructure may harbour mosquito populations 
  • Natural vegetation and habitat loss 
  • High sediment loads may damage equipment 
  • Captured stormwater requires treatment prior to use 
  • Above ground storage can occupy a relatively large area 
  • Stormwater harvesting alone is not reliable for irrigation without a mains supply during times of limited rainfall 
  • Ecological impacts if drawdown occurs during drought periods.


Figure 19: Typical stormwater harvesting


Infrastructure not supported by council

Table 16: Proprietary stormwater treatment devices
WSUD type
Application
Key considerations

Media filtration devices

Do NOT install

  • A device for the removal of total suspended solids, nutrients and other pollutants 
  • Uses filter media such as sand, peat, perlite, zeolite and carbon.
  • Post treatment of stormwater is required to remove gross pollutants 
  • Fouling of filtration unit can result, due to growth of biofilms 
  • Requires direct maintenance access 
  • Very high life cycle costs 
  • Proprietary products with specialised components will not be accepted due to issues with maintenance and replacement of parts.

Trash nets (drainage outlet nets)

Do NOT install

  • Net filtering system used to trap litter and debris transported by stormwater pipes 
  • Installed on the outlet of drainage pipes.
  • Require ongoing maintenance cleaning 
  • Collected debris requires separation to enable recycling 
  • Requires direct maintenance access 
  • If not adequately maintained, these devices can degrade water quality through re-contamination after first flush events 
  • May impact public perception – littering is now acceptable because it will be captured in the nets.

Sand filters

Do NOT install

  • Stormwater passes through a sand filter media that has no vegetation growing on the surface.
  • Uses either graded sand (fine to course heterogenous) or coarse monograde sand (uniform size or homogenous).
  • Reduced stormwater treatment performance compared to bio-retention systems 
  • Sand filters clog up with sediment and have no ability for backwashing 
  • Increased maintenance requirements 
  • Requires direct maintenance access.


Auxiliary embellishments

Auxiliary embellishments incorporated within open spaces ensure that public places are vibrant, inclusive, accessible, and meet the needs of people of all ages, abilities and backgrounds.

LIM_WSUD_pic_maintenance_ (1).jpg

Open spaces are activated by the provision of facilities such as seats and shelters which welcome locals and visitors, providing a basis for maintaining safe environments through CPTED (Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design) principles.

See LIM Introduction and design principles for further guidance.

Maintenance: access tracks and service areas

Access tracks and service areas will be required to maintain WSUD components. Their requirements will vary dependent on the specific WSUD component. The following are examples of items that must be considered:

  • maintenance access track:
LIM_WSUD_pic_maintenance_ (3).jpg
    • minimum width and gradient for service/maintenance vehicles (e.g. posi-track, weed harvesting vessel). 
    • suitable construction, possibly with reinforced materials.
    • reinforced turf should be designed and laid to maintain optimal health.
LIM_WSUD_pic_maintenance_ (2).jpg
    • some may require construction of a concrete hardstand
    • include provision for turning vehicles
    • a lockable gate to restrict public access
    • provision for stockpiling materials
    • provision for maintenance activities.

All vegetated stormwater assets require a maintenance report as per Sunshine Coast Flooding and Stormwater Management Guideline requirements. 

See the following for further guidance:


Drainage infrastructure

Note:  This section should be read in conjunction with LIM Landscape drainage.

Further drainage infrastructure is documented in LIM Landscape drainage. This category refers to constructed items such as surface drainage, sub-surface drainage, side drains (swales and bio-swales), trench drains and grates, pipes and culverts, causeways and stepping stones, French drains.

Signage

Note:  This section should be read in conjunction with LIM Signage suite.

LIM_WSUD_pic_education signs_2.jpg

Educational signage can play an important role in creating an interactive design, engaging users in the space and educating them on WSUD functions. 

Creating public awareness of WSUD functions can also be advantageous, particularly near residential areas. This can establish expectations around plant species selections, maintenance regimes and reduces the potential for unauthorised modifications. Some locations may benefit from education messaging regarding appropriate behaviours, such as 'Take your litter with you', 'Mind the wildlife', or 'No fishing'.

LIM Signage outlines various templates for Council Signage that may be used at WSUD locations.


Paths, trails and tracks

Note:  This section should be read in conjunction with LIM Paths, trails and tracks.

Further pathway information is documented in LIM Paths, trails and tracks (PTT). It is important that equal access is considered in relation to the design of the pathway. Items such as the width (including the clearance area required beside a path), grade, selection of surface materials and target user groups, all are important considerations when planning and designing PTT.  

PTT also includes design development information such as environmental management, benching and batters (greater than 1:4 slope is preferred for ease of maintenance), materials suitability, drainage, soil types and load rating. Surface types are discussed in further detail. Fire access trails are also documented. 

Boardwalks and viewing platforms

Note:  This section should be read in conjunction with LIM Boardwalks and viewing platforms.

LIM Boardwalks and viewing platforms should be referred to where PTTs require this infrastructure.  These embellishments can provide elevated pedestrian access for viewing of waterbodies as part of successful co-location of open space functions. With good strategic design, selected locations may include signage as part of an educational promotion with the community.

Fences and gates

Note:  This section should be read in conjunction with LIM Fences and gates.

Ramps and stairs

Note:  This section should be read in conjunction with LIM Ramps and stairs.

Ramps and stairs should be referred to where PTTs require this infrastructure. This category also includes pedestrian infrastructure for recreation trails and low energy waterways, such as lakes and canals.

Vegetation management

Note:  This section should be read in conjunction with LIM Trees - sensitive design (existing and new trees)

LIM Trees – sensitive design (existing and new trees) outlines various design solutions to protect trees. Methods discussed include elevated pathways and above grade pathways (no dig). Items such as artificial environments (for tree roots) and permeable surfaces are also documented.   Passive irrigation of trees is documented as a benefit of directing road run-off and stormwater, away from the stormwater network. 

Planting palette

Note:  This section should be read in conjunction with LIM Planting palette.

LIM Planting palette contains a planting index that documents plants suitable for bio-retention systems (refer planting index table, in the section heading -sedges, reeds, rushes and other wetland edge plants).

Other

Guidance for the other relevant WSUD auxiliary embellishments is located in other categories of the LIM, including but not limited to the above list.

Page payload data

This component is currently in development

 

Sunshine Coast Open Space Landscape Infrastructure Manual (LIM) DISCLAIMER

Disclaimer

Information contained in this document may change without notice and you should use the current material available from Council’s website and not rely on material previously printed or stored by you.

All figures and diagrams are intended to be used as an aid to design and include Council’s preferred elements but they are not intended to be prescriptive and may need to be varied as dictated by site specific factors. While Council has exercised reasonable care in preparing this document, it does not warrant or represent that it is accurate or complete. The Council will not accept responsibility for any loss, damage, cost or expense that you may incur as a result of the use of or reliance upon any material contained in this document.

This document is produced to convey general information and is not intended to constitute advice whether professional or legal. Any reference to legislation in this document is not an interpretation of the law. It is to be used as a guide only. Consult relevant authority websites for current documents, revisions and amendments.

Where a particular product or supplier is profiled in this document, Council is NOT nominating this product or supplier as the selected choice. Product/supplier information has been provided to allow users to source products which contain the correct elements required for Council embellishments. Each product profiled states ‘or equivalent’ which means that different products may be supplied provided they satisfy the identified performance criteria, recommended standards, equal access guidance and product specifications.

Product design, manufacture and installation requires appropriately qualified people to provide site specific solutions to ensure the embellishment is appropriately adapted to local conditions and data.

This document does not override requirements stipulated in a development approval. Project specific variations may be appropriate as a result of site, environmental or other constraints. Any variations to these standards must be approved in writing by council prior to commencement of variation works. Components of this document may be used within a contract document but users should undertake their own investigations to confirm the information is suitable for this purpose.

Drawings contained in this document are NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.

Details in this document are deemed to be the minimum standard and the user may wish to apply a higher standard subject to approval by council.

Acknowledgements

Council wishes to thank all contributors and stakeholders involved in the development of this document.

Copyright

Sunshine Coast Regional Council (Council) supports and encourages the distribution of its material however, copyright protects this document. Council has no objection to this material being reproduced but only if council is recognised as the owner of the copyright and this material remains unaltered.

https://www.sunshinecoast.qld.gov.au[email protected]07 5475 7272

Sunshine Coast Open Space Landscape Infrastructure Manual (LIM)

 | 

© LIM 2024 – 2026

 | 

Version 0.0.38.beta

 | 

Last Updated: 01/04/2026 12:27 AM

Preview